.net binary web services.

.net binary web services.

• TheRealMrT

  Since web services = SOAP (plus a bunch of other standards in various ratification phases), which is XML based, what do you mean by binary web services
  
  

• Gorm Braarvig

  I agree with Udi that if you don't need interoperability there is less motivation to use Web services. Though - One reason to go with Web services anyway is the built-in separation of contract and policy.

  Arnon

  
  
  

• FS2K

  I think i meant binary XML.

  http://www.webservices.org/weblog/colin_adam/getting_your_message_across_in_binary

  Thanks.

  
  
  

• Paul Gerald

  not using it,

  but I think there are only two things that you must take in consideration: the advantage is performance and the diadvantage is that you don't know if the receiver has the same binairy protocol

  
  
  

• BradyGuy

  If you choose performance over interoperability, then why use web services in the first place Simply the fact that you mentioned .net directs me to the understanding that you have .net on both sides of the wire. So, do you really need interoperability
  
  
• .net binary web services.