Hi,
Can someone explain me the difference between .NET Framework 2.0 and .NET Framework 2.0 Redistributable
Thanks & Regards,
Ken
Difference b/w .NET Framework 2.0 and .NET Framework 2.0 Redistributable
Hot Topic
- XSLT - Getting the first N elements.
- How to validate data against schema and save as xml file
- Can't access UserState with cancellation on BackgroundWorker
- Strange Error when executing a stored procedure
- Caching
- Resources & ImageLists
- writing a Telnet client with VB. NET
- USB Drive Name
- Is it possible to serialize data in XML from a class containing a generic collection?
- ConfigurationManager and app.config question
.NET Development
- Problems connecting to sybase from serviced component
- MDF File/DB Setup Within an Application
- Unhandled Exception - Object reference not set to an instance of an object
- How to perform a case insensitive filter when the DataTable has CaseSensitive=True
- NET 1.1 AND 2.0 UNINSTALL/FIX/INSTALL/UPDATE INOP
- In XSD, how can I make the elements occur in freewill order? (Tested in SQL 2005 Express Edition)
- Failed to add DataTable
- SoapHttpClientProtocol slower in .net framework 2.0 than .net framework1.1?
- Getting processes by window caption
- using javascript ......
Difference b/w .NET Framework 2.0 and .NET Framework 2.0 Redistributable
David S. Anderson
The .NET Framework 2.0 Redistributable means the .NET Framework 2.0 runtime, the .NET Framework 2.0 is the .NET Framework 2.0 SDK.
If you are going to run .NET 2.0 applications, you just need to install .NET Framework 2.0 Redistributable. But if you are going to also develop .NET 2.0 applications using Visual Studio 2005, you also need to install the .NET Framework 2.0 SDK. Visual Studio 2005 already include both .NET Framework 2.0 Redistributable and .NET Framework 2.0 SDK which will be installed to your system if it found that your system is missing either one of them or both.
ksona
redistributable allows you to send the package to other end users, as it does not violate the EULA AFAIK. It's all in one "compliant" package so you can safely redistribute this package (without selling of course)
im not sure about the "non redistributable" version but I believe it maybe the same thing in a sense. Again im not sure so don't quote me.
In terms of runtime, shouldnt be any difference.