FxCop throwing error

FxCop throwing error

• Roach

  Have you attached to FxCop using the debugger to see which line is throwing the error
  
  

• Jon Braganza

  No, there isn't enough information here to troubleshoot your problem. Can you please locate the XML output file FxCop generates when you see the problem, and try to locate the exact line of code that is raising the exception There should be a complete stack in the log.

  The name of the file will be [YourBinaryName].CodeAnalysisLog.xml.

  btw - what kind of project are you analyzing when the exception occurs can you analyze other project types successfully

  
  
  

• andrewds17

  Hi David,

  Thanks for the concern. It's working now.

  I was running the FxCop on web applications. Now it's working fine.

  Thanks,

  ThunderRock

  
  

• rternier

  I'll assume this is a custom rule as we do not have rules with a CheckID of CA5035.

  Without seeing the code, it's impossible to guess at what is causing the problem. Try debugging the issue by compiling your custom rules against FxCop 1.35, and attaching to FxCop during analysis (or rather just before it begins).

  
  
  

• BipinP

  Hi David,

  This is a custom rule. I've included the code herewith. Kindly check and reply back. It's giving the same error as before.

  The code for rule CA5035 is as follows:

  public override ProblemCollection Check(Member pobjMember)

  {

  //Do the null check

  if (pobjMember == null)

  return null;

  // Declare a flag variable to check for Publish method found or not

  bool blnPublishFound = false;

  // Declare a flag variable to check for catch block found or not

  bool blnCatchFound = false;

  // Converts type 'Microsoft.Cci.Member' to 'Microsoft.Cci.Method'

  // via a built in conversion

  Method objMethod = pobjMember as Method;

  //If the method is null, return null

  if (objMethod == null)

  return null;

  //Store the method name in the string variable

  string strMethodName = objMethod.Name.Name;

  // Set a intCount

  int intCount = 0;

  //Check if the method is null. If not, then enter the condition

  if (RuleUtilities.IsEventHandling(objMethod))

  {

  //For loop is used to check through all the instruction inside the method

  for (int intCounter = intCount; intCounter < objMethod.Instructions.Length; intCounter++)

  {

  //If the opcode encountered is throw or rethrow, then passed.

  if ((objMethod.Instructions[intCounter].OpCode == OpCode._Catch) || intCount > 0)

  {

  // Set the catch flag to true as catch block is found

  blnCatchFound = true;

  // Check if the opcode value is call or callvirt. If yes, then condition passed

  if (objMethod.Instructions[intCounter].OpCode == OpCode.Call

  || objMethod.Instructions[intCounter].OpCode == OpCode.Callvirt)

  {

  // Store the full name of the instruction in a local variable

  string strTempStore = ((Microsoft.Cci.Method)(objMethod.Instructions[intCounter].Value)).FullName;

  // Check if the call or callvirt has operand Microsoft.ApplicationBlocks.ExceptionManagement.ExceptionManager.Publish(System.Exception)

  if (strTempStore.Contains("ExceptionManager.Publish"))

  {

  // Set the Publish method found flag to true.

  blnPublishFound = true;

  }

  // Else increment intCount

  else

  {

  intCount++;

  }

  }

  // If the call or callvirt is not found, then increment intCount

  // Go to next statement

  else

  {

  intCount++;

  }

  // Check for the opcode value _EndHandler. This indicates the end of the catch block

  // If found, then break

  if (objMethod.Instructions[intCounter].OpCode == OpCode._EndHandler)

  {

  // Check if Publish method is found. If not found, then add to problem collection

  if (blnCatchFound && !blnPublishFound)

  {

  // Add to problem collection

  Problems.Add(new Problem(GetResolution(strMethodName), strMethodName));

  break;

  }

  // Set the flags to false again so as to start the check for other catch block

  blnCatchFound = false;

  blnPublishFound = false;

  }

  }

  }

  }

  return Problems;

  }

  I've given only the check method part. The class inherits a base class which inherits from the

  BaseIntrospectionRule.

  Regards,

  ThunderRock

  
  

• John R. Garrett

  Hi David,

  I've done that too. But when I used debugger, the rule is working fine. The above rule starts giving the errors only when all the rules which I have developed, run together. Otherwise each rule when run alone works fine....

  Can you tell me what could be the reason for this type of behaviour

  Thanks,

  ThunderRock

  
  
• FxCop throwing error